Accessibility Report — flipbook.clovitek.com

CloviAbleAccessibility Report

📄 Static HTML scan (heuristic)

CloviAble

Web Accessibility Conformance Audit

Report IDCA-20260818-9C03D89D

Report date2026-08-18

Site audited	flipbook.clovitek.com
Standard tested	WCAG 2.1 Level AA (W3C)
Scope	Primary page (homepage) of the domain, automated evaluation
Methodology	static HTML heuristic scan. Automated tooling can verify only a subset of WCAG success criteria; criteria that require human judgement are explicitly marked Not Tested (manual review needed) rather than assumed to pass.
Prepared by	CloviAble — automated accessibility audit engine

This is an automated conformance audit, not a legal certification of compliance. Full WCAG conformance can only be established by a qualified manual audit. CloviAble reports what was measured — no theater.

SECTION 2

Executive summary

At riskWeighted score

Findings by severity

criteria pass

criteria fail

not tested

total findings

Conformance of tested criteria: 72% (8 of 11 machine-tested criteria pass; 39 of 50 total criteria require manual review and are excluded from this figure).

How this score was computed

The weighted score reflects automated findings penalised by severity (critical > serious > moderate > minor). The conformance percentage is the share of machine-tested WCAG 2.1 A/AA criteria that pass — criteria we could not test by machine are reported separately as Not Tested and are never silently counted as passing. This is a deliberate departure from overlay-vendor "compliance %" figures, which do not disclose what was actually measured.

Scanned 2026-08-18T16:11:02.722047Z · static HTML analysis of the homepage

SECTION 6 · CHART

Pass rate by WCAG principle (POUR)

Each axis shows the share of machine-tested criteria that pass within that principle. Perceivable · Operable · Understandable · Robust. A short axis flags where the site is weakest.

SECTION 3

WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance matrix

Every WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA success criterion is enumerated below and marked Pass, Fail, or Not Tested (manual review needed). Unlike overlay-vendor reports, we do not hide untested criteria or count them as passing. No browser-rendered deep scan was available for this domain, so contrast, keyboard and focus criteria are reported as Not Tested. Run a deep scan for fuller machine coverage. WCAG Level AAA criteria are out of scope for AA conformance and are not tested.

50 criteria (A+AA)11 machine-tested8 pass3 fail39 not tested

Perceivable

SC	Success criterion	Status
1.1.1	Non-text Content A	Passvia static HTML scan
1.2.1	Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) A	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.2.2	Captions (Prerecorded) A	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.2.3	Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) A	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.2.4	Captions (Live) AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.2.5	Audio Description (Prerecorded) AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.3.1	Info and Relationships A	Failvia static HTML scan
1.3.2	Meaningful Sequence A	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.3.3	Sensory Characteristics A	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.3.4	Orientation AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.3.5	Identify Input Purpose AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.4.1	Use of Color A	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.4.2	Audio Control A	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.4.3	Contrast (Minimum) AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.4.4	Resize Text AA	Passvia static HTML scan
1.4.5	Images of Text AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.4.10	Reflow AA	Passvia static HTML scan
1.4.11	Non-text Contrast AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.4.12	Text Spacing AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
1.4.13	Content on Hover or Focus AA	Not Testedmanual review needed

Operable

SC	Success criterion	Status
2.1.1	Keyboard A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.1.2	No Keyboard Trap A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.1.4	Character Key Shortcuts A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.2.1	Timing Adjustable A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.2.2	Pause, Stop, Hide A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.3.1	Three Flashes or Below Threshold A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.4.1	Bypass Blocks A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.4.2	Page Titled A	Passvia static HTML scan
2.4.3	Focus Order A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.4.4	Link Purpose (In Context) A	Failvia static HTML scan
2.4.5	Multiple Ways AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.4.6	Headings and Labels AA	Passvia static HTML scan
2.4.7	Focus Visible AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.5.1	Pointer Gestures A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.5.2	Pointer Cancellation A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.5.3	Label in Name A	Not Testedmanual review needed
2.5.4	Motion Actuation A	Not Testedmanual review needed

Understandable

SC	Success criterion	Status
3.1.1	Language of Page A	Passvia static HTML scan
3.1.2	Language of Parts AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
3.2.1	On Focus A	Not Testedmanual review needed
3.2.2	On Input A	Not Testedmanual review needed
3.2.3	Consistent Navigation AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
3.2.4	Consistent Identification AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
3.3.1	Error Identification A	Not Testedmanual review needed
3.3.2	Labels or Instructions A	Passvia static HTML scan
3.3.3	Error Suggestion AA	Not Testedmanual review needed
3.3.4	Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) AA	Not Testedmanual review needed

Robust

SC	Success criterion	Status
4.1.1	Parsing A	Passvia static HTML scan
4.1.2	Name, Role, Value A	Failvia static HTML scan
4.1.3	Status Messages AA	Not Testedmanual review needed

SECTION 4

Legal & litigation-exposure overview

Medium riskSome failures detected; remediation reduces exposure.

Law	Applies to	Standard	Key dates	Your status
ADA Title II — Web & Mobile Accessibility Rule United States	State and local government entities (public entities): cities, counties, public universities, courts, transit, public schools, libraries, and their contractors/online services.	WCAG 2.1 AA	rule published: 2024-04-24; compliance large entities: 2026-04-24 (public entities with population ≥ 50,000); compliance small entities: 2027-04-26 (public entities with population < 50,000, and special district governments)	At risk
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act United States (federal)	U.S. federal agencies and vendors selling ICT (information and communication technology) to the federal government. Drives demand for VPAT/ACR documents.	WCAG 2.0 AA (via Revised 508 Standards / harmonized with EN 301 549)	revised standards effective: 2018-01-18	At risk
European Accessibility Act (EAA) / EN 301 549 European Union	Private-sector products and services sold in the EU: e-commerce, banking, e-books, ticketing, transport, telecoms, computers, smartphones, ATMs/terminals. Microenterprises (<10 staff and ≤€2M turnover) providing services are largely exempt.	EN 301 549 → WCAG 2.1 AA	directive adopted: 2019-04-17; member state transposition: 2022-06-28; enforcement begins: 2025-06-28; transition for certain service contracts: 2030-06-28	At risk
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) — IASR Information & Communications Standard Ontario, Canada	Ontario public-sector organizations and private/non-profit organizations with 50+ employees. (Smaller orgs have reduced obligations.)	WCAG 2.0 AA	wcag 2 0 aa deadline: 2021-01-01 (all applicable internet websites and web content); compliance reporting: ongoing periodic accessibility compliance reports to the Ontario government	At risk

Failing criteria that map to these legal requirements: 1.3.1 Info and Relationships, 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context), 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value.

What this means for you: the failing criteria above are the same barriers cited in accessibility demand letters and regulatory actions. We map your measured failures to the laws that may apply — we do not claim compliance or grant safe harbor. Only a qualified audit plus remediation can establish legal compliance.

SECTION 5

Severity-prioritized remediation plan

Ordered by severity, then by how commonly each issue appears across sites we scan, then by local occurrences. Each item lists the affected elements, a copy-paste fix and an effort estimate. Fixing the top 3 issues resolves 100% of all detected occurrences.

1seriousButtons with no accessible nameWCAG 4.1.2Moderate· 2 occurrences Real-world prevalence: seen on 60% of sites scanned · 5 occurrences observed

Fix: Add visible text or an aria-label to every <button>.

Affected elements:

<button @click="open=!open" class="md:hidden p-2 text-gray-700">

<button @click="annual=!annual" class="relative w-14 h-7 rounded-full bg-brand transition-colors">

<button aria-label="Close dialog">×</button>

2seriousLinks with no readable textWCAG 2.4.4Moderate· 3 occurrences

Fix: Provide visible link text, or an aria-label / alt text on an inner image.

Affected elements:

<a href="#" class="w-9 h-9 rounded-lg bg-white/5 hover:bg-brand flex items-center justify-center transition-colors">

<a href="#" class="w-9 h-9 rounded-lg bg-white/5 hover:bg-brand flex items-center justify-center transition-colors">

<a href="#" class="w-9 h-9 rounded-lg bg-white/5 hover:bg-brand flex items-center justify-center transition-colors">

<a href="/cart" aria-label="View cart">
  <svg aria-hidden="true">…</svg>
</a>

3moderateHeading levels skipWCAG 1.3.1Moderate· 1 occurrence Real-world prevalence: seen on 40% of sites scanned · 8 occurrences observed

Fix: Use heading levels in order (h1 → h2 → h3) without skipping.

Affected elements:

h2→h4

<h2>Section</h2>
  <h3>Sub-section</h3>  <!-- not <h4> -->

Detailed results by WCAG principle

Each automated check below is grouped under one of the four WCAG 2.1 principles. Passing checks are shown alongside failures for full transparency.

Perceivable

Information and UI must be presentable in ways users can perceive.

PASS

Images have alt text

WCAG 1.1.1

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Responsive viewport is set

WCAG 1.4.10

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Pinch-zoom is allowed

WCAG 1.4.4

No issues found for this check.

Operable

UI components and navigation must be operable.

PASS

Page has a descriptive title

WCAG 2.4.2

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Title length is reasonable

WCAG 2.4.2

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Page has one H1

WCAG 2.4.6

No issues found for this check.

PASS

No duplicate H1s

WCAG 1.3.1

No issues found for this check.

FAIL

Heading levels skip

moderateWCAG 1.3.1Real-world prevalence: seen on 40% of sites scanned · 6 occurrences observed

Skipped heading levels break the logical document outline for screen readers.

1 occurrence detected.

Sampled from the page:

h2→h4

How to fix: Use heading levels in order (h1 → h2 → h3) without skipping.

<h2>Section</h2>
  <h3>Sub-section</h3>  <!-- not <h4> -->

FAIL

Links with no readable text

seriousWCAG 2.4.4

Icon-only or empty links are announced as just "link", giving no destination context.

3 occurrences detected.

Sampled from the page:

<a href="#" class="w-9 h-9 rounded-lg bg-white/5 hover:bg-brand flex items-center justify-center transition-colors">

<a href="#" class="w-9 h-9 rounded-lg bg-white/5 hover:bg-brand flex items-center justify-center transition-colors">

<a href="#" class="w-9 h-9 rounded-lg bg-white/5 hover:bg-brand flex items-center justify-center transition-colors">

How to fix: Provide visible link text, or an aria-label / alt text on an inner image.

<a href="/cart" aria-label="View cart">
  <svg aria-hidden="true">…</svg>
</a>

PASS

Focused elements not obscured by sticky elements (2.4.11)

WCAG 2.4.11

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Accessible name contains visible text (2.5.3)

WCAG 2.5.3

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Interactive elements meet minimum target size (2.5.8)

WCAG 2.5.8

No issues found for this check.

PASS

No positive tabindex values breaking focus order (2.4.3)

WCAG 2.4.3

No issues found for this check.

Understandable

Information and the operation of the UI must be understandable.

PASS

Page language is declared

WCAG 3.1.1

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Language value is valid

WCAG 3.1.1

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Form fields are labelled

WCAG 3.3.2

No issues found for this check.

PASS

Help/contact link present for consistent help (3.2.6)

WCAG 3.2.6

No issues found for this check.

Robust

Content must be robust enough to work with assistive technologies.

PASS

Character encoding is declared

WCAG 4.1.1

No issues found for this check.

FAIL

Buttons with no accessible name

seriousWCAG 4.1.2Real-world prevalence: seen on 60% of sites scanned · 5 occurrences observed

A button with no text or label is announced only as "button", with no purpose.

2 occurrences detected.

Sampled from the page:

<button @click="open=!open" class="md:hidden p-2 text-gray-700">

<button @click="annual=!annual" class="relative w-14 h-7 rounded-full bg-brand transition-colors">

How to fix: Add visible text or an aria-label to every <button>.

<button aria-label="Close dialog">×</button>

PASS

No duplicate id attributes

WCAG 4.1.1

No issues found for this check.

European Accessibility Act (EAA) Readiness

The EAA became enforceable June 2025. Websites of businesses operating in the EU must comply with WCAG 2.1 AA minimum. This applies to any business offering digital products or services to EU customers — not just EU-headquartered companies.

Significant accessibility work needed: 34/100

Your score: 34/100 — Multiple serious barriers detected. Full remediation and a qualified manual audit are required to meet EAA requirements.

Based on automated WCAG 2.1 AA checks. Manual testing with assistive technology is also required for full EAA compliance. Learn more about EAA →

Manual review recommended

CloviAble scans static HTML, so it reports only what can be verified honestly from markup. The following require a human or a browser-rendered audit and are not reflected in the score above:

Color-contrast ratios — Computing text/background contrast needs rendered, computed CSS colors — not available from raw HTML.
Keyboard tab order & operability — Whether every control is reachable and in a logical order requires actually tabbing through the live page.
Visible focus indicators — Focus styling is defined in CSS and only observable when an element is focused in a browser.
Dynamic ARIA states — aria-expanded, aria-pressed, live-region updates etc. change at runtime via JavaScript.
Screen-reader announcement quality — How content is actually announced depends on the AT + browser pairing and must be tested manually.
Meaningful reading/DOM order — Whether the visual order matches the DOM order needs a rendered layout to confirm.
Media captions & transcripts — Presence and accuracy of captions for audio/video cannot be judged from markup alone.

🛡️ Also check Security with CloviScan

Accessibility is only half the picture. CloviScan audits SSL, security headers, DNS email auth, and performance — all free, instant, no signup.

Free Security Scan →

Export this report

Pro reports can be saved and shared.

Download PDF Download HTML Re-scan

SECTION 7

Methodology & formal disclaimer

This report combines a static-HTML heuristic scan (20 checks on the server-fetched homepage) (no browser-rendered deep scan was available for this domain). Findings are mapped to WCAG 2.1 Level AA success criteria and organised by the four POUR principles. The weighted score is penalised by issue severity.

Automated-testing limitations: automated tooling can reliably detect only a subset of WCAG success criteria. Criteria requiring human judgement (alt-text quality, meaningful sequence, captions accuracy, link purpose in context, and others) are reported as Not Tested (manual review needed) in the conformance matrix and are never assumed to pass.

This is an automated audit, not a legal certification. A passing automated result does not by itself establish WCAG conformance or legal compliance; a qualified manual audit is recommended for full conformance. CloviAble reports only what was measured — real accessibility, no theater.

Report ID: CA-20260818-9C03D89DGenerated: 2026-08-18T16:11:02.722047ZStandard: WCAG 2.1 Level AAPrepared by CloviAble

Reference: WCAG 2.1 Quick Reference (W3C) · Level AA.

Powered by CloviAble intelligence: a curated knowledge base of 31 accessibility checks and 4 accessibility laws. Real-world prevalence figures are derived from 5 sites scanned so far.